Ah, the first day of school. It always reminds us of this Staples ad.
But for those of you who aren’t enthused about the return of classes, we have some good news. It’s not your fault school is boring! From the Washington Post’s Valerie Strauss (emphasis ours):
[T]he problems may lie beyond your child. According to cognitive scientist Daniel Willingham, it could be the school that is boring the heck out of your child.
A professor of psychology at the University of Virginia, Willingham studies how people think and learn by looking at the biological and cognitive basis of learning. His conclusions about what this all means for your child sitting in class for eight hours a day may cause you to rethink how your child is being educated.
The conclusion we’ve come to after reading articles about Facebook in the New York Times and Washington Post this weekend is that people are leaving the social networking service because they don’t know what to put under their religious views. In all seriousness, the religious views question is one a lot of people do struggle with. From William Wan’s Post story:
For the longest time, the question just sat there on his screen. Cursor blinking. Waiting quietly, like a patient priest in a confessor’s box. Religious Views: _____.
Creating a Facebook profile for the first time, Eric Heim hadn’t expected something so serious. Hunched over his laptop, he had whipped through the social network Web site’s questionnaire about his interests, favorite movies and relationship status, typing witty replies wherever possible. But when he reached the little blank box asking for his core beliefs, it stopped him short.
“It’s Facebook. The whole point is to keep it light and playful, you know?” said Heim, 27, a college student from Dumfries. “But a question like that kind of makes you think.”
Such public proclamations of beliefs used to require a baptism in water, or a circumcision, or learning the five pillars of Islam. Now Facebook users announce their spiritual identity with the stroke of a few keys. And what they are typing into the open-ended box offers a revealing peek into modern faith and what happens to that faith as it migrates online.
Inside Higher Ed, meanwhile, discovered a sharp increase in Pell Grant spending in an Obama White House document:
But buried within the Office of Management and Budget’s “mid-session review” (see Page 21) is a startling figure that arguably has both good news and bad news for President Obama’s higher education strategy.
The budget document shows that federal spending on the Pell Grant Program will be $27 billion higher over the next decade than the administration estimated as recently as February. At that time, the cost of making Pell Grants an entitlement and having it increase automatically each year was estimated at $117 billion over 10 years.
The good news (such as it is) for President Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan is that the budget office attributes the shortfall to sharp increases in the number of students using federal aid to enroll in college this fall — a typical result when the economy nosedives, but also arguably a sign that Americans are responding to the president’s call for every American to have at least a year of higher education…
The enrollment numbers may hearten administration officials. But the new budget figures are probably prompting more consternation than celebration at the Education Department and among Congressional Democrats, because they would appear to threaten, or at least complicate, President Obama’s plan to end lending through the guaranteed student loan program and use the savings to increase Pell Grant spending and address a slew of other education priorities. That’s because the estimate would seem to increase the cost of the president’s Pell Grant plan sharply over 10 years.
On the state level, it turns out the Board of Public Works, which has been slashing the university’s (and the state government as a whole’s) budget pretty frequently the last two years, is something of a rarity. From Aaron C. Davis’ Post article:
The weighty decisions will be made by Maryland’s Board of Public Works, a generically named three-person panel that toils mostly in obscurity, approving a seemingly endless number of state contracts during good times, but whose power is felt intensely by millions of residents when difficult decisions need to be made.
The board — made up of O’Malley and two fellow Democrats whom many Marylanders might be hard-pressed to name, Comptroller Peter Franchot and Treasurer Nancy K. Kopp — is a one-of-a-kind setup, according to political analysts and historians. In most places, state legislators must approve budget cuts, and a handful of governors have the power to strike funding line by line. But the board is the only state entity with constitutional authority to cut as much as 25 percent of funding for almost any state program or agency, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Last but not least, the Post says increased sales of whitey tighties may be a sign the recession is over. Ylan Q. Mui reports:
Here’s the theory, briefly: Sales of men’s underwear typically are stable because they rank as a necessity. But during times of severe financial strain, men will try to stretch the time between buying new pairs, causing underwear sales to dip.
“It’s a prolonged purchase,” said Marshal Cohen, senior analyst with the consumer research firm NPD Group. “It’s like trying to drive your car an extra 10,000 miles.”
The growth in sales of men’s underwear began to slow last year as the recession took hold, according to Mintel, another research firm. This year, Mintel expects sales to fall 2.3 percent, the first drop since the company started collecting data in 2003.
But the men’s underwear index — or, conveniently, MUI — may also have a silver lining. Mintel predicts that next year, men’s underwear sales will fall by 0.5 percent, and as with many economic indicators, a slowing of a decline can be welcomed as a step in the right direction. Retailers are reporting encouraging signs in the men’s underwear department. Sears spokeswoman Amy Dimond said stores are beginning to see more sales. At Target, spokeswoman Jana O’Leary said sales of men’s underwear have been stronger over the past two months and multi-pair packs are moving.
Quick Hits
- State lawmakers are being asked to give up pay, the Post says.
- The Baltimore Sun postulates that Virgin Fest was JUST AS AWESOME despite being smaller this year.
- Budget cuts are forcing the State Department of Agriculture to close an animal research lab in College Park, WBAL reports.
- The faculty at Montgomery College, which feeds a lot of students to the university, voted ‘No confidence’ in their president. (7th item down.)
What’s Happening Today?
- It’s the first day of classes.
- A university system workgroup on adjuncts and graduate assistants holds a public hearing at the USM office in Adelphi at 1 p.m.
- Beyond the Classroom screens “The Lost Boys of Sudan” at 7 p.m. in South Campus Commons Building 1.
Tags: Morning Roundup
[...] Morning Roundup – Back to School Edition « Campus Drive blogs.umdbk.com/campusdrive/2009/08/31/morning-roundup-back-to-school-edition – view page – cached #Campus Drive » Feed Campus Drive » Comments Feed Campus Drive » Morning Roundup – Back to School Edition Comments Feed Campus Drive Check back on Aug. 31 Check back on Aug. 31 — From the page [...]
Source:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kate-kelly/the-american-spirit-perso_b_268138.html
Kate Kelly
Author of six-volume history of medicine and Election Day
in The Huffington Post, August 25, 2009
The American Spirit Personified
Read More: Fred A. Kahn, G.I. Bill, Holocaust, Military, Presidential Debates, Politics News In what can only be described as a miracle of Internet connectivity, I have heard from a person whttp://http://americacomesalive.com/blog/2008/09/long-history-of-debates.htmlhom I mentioned in a blog post I wrote last autumn about how and when the tradition of presidential debates began http://americacomesalive.com/blog/2008/09/long-history-of-debates.html. In the post, I noted that debates are a relatively recent phenomenon, originally suggested in 1956 by a University of Maryland student by the name of Fred A. Kahn, who was credited with the idea in newspapers of the day.
Kahn did what he could to get the idea rolling, but it was four years later when the League of Women Voters stepped forward to sponsor the first scheduled presidential debates in 1960. That debate, of course, was the precedent-setting televised debate between Richard M. Nixon and John F. Kennedy.
About a month ago, I checked my In Box and found several e-mail messages from Fred A. Kahn. Because several months had passed, I did not immediately remember the name, but something caught my attention, and I opened the first message and realized who it was. Wow! This was thrilling! I quickly responded to Mr. Kahn, and set a time for a telephone interview. I wanted to hear about how the idea of the debates had occurred to him and what had happened to him since that time.
Kahn’s story represents everything that is good about this country. Kahn was born in 1932 to Jewish parents in Germany, just 40 days before Hitler came to power. His parents fled to Belgium to escape the Nazis. Because traveling with a newborn would have put them all at risk, they left the baby with a childless aunt and uncle eager to care for him. The political situation did not improve so returning for their son became unworkable, but in 1938, with the signing of the Munich Pact (with Great Britain and France agreeing to many of Hitler’s demands), circumstances for Jews in Germany became more dire.
Kahn’s father worked through connections to arrange for a family friend, a Christian, to bring Kahn by tram to the German border where the family hoped guards would feel there was no harm in letting such a young child cross into Belgium without the necessary paperwork. The two countries had a “no man’s land between them,” and Kahn’s father stood on the Belgian side imploring the guards to let the young boy cross, calling, “C’est mon fils!” Fritz, as he was called then, finally was permitted to cross to the father he had never known, and he went into hiding with his family. He and his parents survived the war but the aunt and uncle who had cared for him were killed in a death camp in Germany.
Kahn immigrated to the United States at the age of 19, and shortly after his arrival in 1952, he received a draft notice for the U.S. Army. Kahn reported for duty but when the officers discovered he was not yet a citizen, they discharged him. Kahn signed up anyway, eventually being assigned to Fort Bragg, the home of the 82nd Airborne. Because of his language skills he was given a role in military intelligence and sent to Germany.
By 1956 Kahn had received his citizenship papers, and he had returned to the United States. Though he was accepted at Johns Hopkins and wanted to attend there, the school was out of the price range of what the young man could afford, even with the help of the G.I. Bill. He enrolled in the University of Maryland where he became vice president of the International Club. It was from this position that he floated out the idea of presidential debates, inviting the 1956 candidates, Adlai Stevenson and Dwight Eisenhower, to come to the university to discuss the issues.
“I wrote up ten reasons why there should be a presidential debate,” explains Kahn. He approached members of both political parties for endorsement of the idea, contacting Eleanor Roosevelt to represent the Democrats, and getting in touch with the Republican Governor of Maryland Theodore McKeldin, who had nominated Dwight Eisenhower at the Republican convention.
“I also contacted the press,” says Kahn. “I sent my information and the endorsements to the AP and UPI. [the major news services of the day].”
Unfortunately, the Maryland Board of Regents that oversees the university stepped in and ruled that no political speeches could be scheduled on campus. A previous experience with a politician who launched his candidacy from the University of Maryland made them gun-shy, and the administrators pointed out that most college students could not vote anyway (18-year-olds did not receive the right to vote until 1971).
But Kahn’s idea took root. In 1960 the League of Women Voters began what is now regarded as a campaign tradition, though now the debates are overseen by a separate Presidential Commission.
Kahn graduated from the University of Maryland and was given a Woodrow Wilson fellowship which permitted him to get a graduate degree from his dream school, Johns Hopkins. He then went on to a 30-year career as a political economist, helping to create the Job Corps for the U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity and then working for the Department of Labor. In 2005, the governor of Maryland appointed Kahn to a new state task force to implement holocaust, genocide, human rights, and tolerance education.
Now in retirement, he devotes his time to reminding people of the horrors of the Holocaust so that it will not be repeated. Kahn oversees a Yahoo group to that purpose, http://Remember_The_Holocaust@yahoogroups.com. Remember_The_Holocaust@yahoogroups.com.
A man who has chosen U.S. citizenship, served in our military, worked for the U.S. government, and donates his time to an important purpose, is a man who is a role model for us all. When I asked Kahn for his best advice to others, he replied without hesitation:
“Lots of people have good ideas but they don’t always do what is necessary to get them out there,” Kahn says. “If there is something that is important to you, get behind it–pursue your ideas.”
——————————————————————————–
Editorial Praising Fred-1956.jpg
Immigrant Urges Presidential Debates-1956.jpg
Letter from Mrs Roosevelt to Fred-1956.jpg
Letter from Gov. Theodore McKeldin to Fred-1956.jpg